R. Bator and R. B. Cialdini, New Ways to Promote Proenvironmental Behavior: The Application of Persuasion Theory to the Development Of Effective Proenvironmental Public Service Announcements, Journal of Social Issues, vol.56, issue.3, pp.527-541, 2000.
DOI : 10.1111/0022-4537.00182

J. S. Black, P. C. Stern, and J. T. Elworth, Personal and contextual influences on househould energy adaptations., Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.70, issue.1, pp.3-21, 1985.
DOI : 10.1037/0021-9010.70.1.3

M. Brauer, L'analyse des variables indépendantes continues et catégorielles : une alternative à la dichotomisation [The analysis of continuous and categorical independent variables: Alternatives to dichotomization]. L'Année Psychologique, pp.449-484, 2002.

M. Brauer and G. Mcclelland, L'utilisation des contrastes dans l'analyse des données : comment tester les hypothèses spécifiques dans la recherche en psychologie [The use of contrasts in data analysis: How to test specific hypotheses in psychological research]. L'Année Psychologique, pp.273-305, 2005.

J. M. Burger, The Foot-in-the-Door Compliance Procedure: A Multiple-Process Analysis and Review, Personality and Social Psychology Review, vol.9, issue.4, pp.303-325, 1999.
DOI : 10.1207/s15327957pspr0304_2

S. M. Burn and S. Oskamp, Increasing Community Recycling with Persuasive Communication and Public Commitment, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol.10, issue.1, pp.29-41, 1986.
DOI : 10.1037//0003-066X.36.4.329

J. A. Corraliza and J. Berenguer, Environmental Values, Beliefs, and Actions: A Situational Approach, Environment and Behavior, vol.32, issue.6, pp.832-848, 2000.
DOI : 10.1177/00139160021972829

C. Demarque, T. Apostolidis, A. Chagnard, and L. Dany, Adaptation et validation française de l'échelle de perspective temporelle « Consideration of future consequences » (CFC) [Adaptation and french validation of the future time perspective scale " Consideration of future consequences, pp.351-360, 2010.

L. Derksen and J. Gartrell, The Social Context of Recycling, American Sociological Review, vol.58, issue.3, pp.434-442, 1993.
DOI : 10.2307/2095910

A. Diekmann and P. Preisendoerfer, Persoenliches Umweltverhalten: Die Diskrepanz zwischen Anspruch und Wirklichkeit, pp.226-251, 1992.

A. Ebreo and J. Vining, How Similar are Recycling and Waste Reduction?: Future Orientation and Reasons for Reducing Waste As Predictors of Self-Reported Behavior, Environment and Behavior, vol.33, issue.3, pp.424-448, 2001.
DOI : 10.1177/00139160121973061

C. Eyssartier, R. V. Joule, and C. Guimelli, Effets comportementaux et cognitifs de l'engagement dans un acte préparatoire activant un élément central versus périphérique de la représentation du don d'organes [Behavioral and cognitive effects of commitment in a preparatory act activating a central versus peripherical element of the representation of organs donation]. Psychologie Française, pp.499-517, 2007.

J. L. Freedman and S. C. Fraser, Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.4, issue.2, pp.195-202, 1966.
DOI : 10.1037/h0023552

G. A. Guagnano, P. C. Stern, and T. Dietz, Influences on Attitude-Behavior Relationships, Environment and Behavior, vol.9, issue.5, pp.699-718, 1995.
DOI : 10.1177/0013916595275005

C. I. Hovland, I. L. Janis, and H. H. Kelley, Communication and persuasion. Psychological studies of opinion change, 1953.

B. B. Jensen, Knowledge, Action and Pro-environmental Behaviour, Environmental Education Research, vol.8, issue.3, pp.325-334, 2002.
DOI : 10.1080/13504620220145474

J. A. Joireman, Environmental problems as social dilemmas: The temporal dimension, Understanding behavior in the context of time, pp.289-304, 2005.

J. A. Joireman, T. P. Lasane, J. Bennett, D. Richards, and S. Solaimani, Integrating social value orientation and the consideration of future consequences within the extended norm activation model of proenvironmental behaviour, British Journal of Social Psychology, vol.40, issue.1, pp.133-155, 2001.
DOI : 10.1348/014466601164731

J. A. Joireman, D. C. Posey, H. B. Truelove, and C. D. Parks, The environmentalist who cried drought: Reactions to repeated warnings about depleting resources under conditions of uncertainty, Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol.29, issue.2, pp.181-192, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.003

J. A. Joireman, P. A. Van-lange, and M. Van-vugt, Who Cares about the Environmental Impact of Cars?: Those with an Eye toward the Future, Environment & Behavior, vol.36, issue.2, pp.187-206, 2004.
DOI : 10.1177/0013916503251476

R. V. Joule and J. L. Beauvois, La soumission librement consentie, 1998.
DOI : 10.3917/puf.beauv.2010.01

R. V. Joule, F. Bernard, A. Geissler, F. Girandola, and S. Halimi-falkowicz, Binding communication at the service of organ donations, International Review of Social Psychology, vol.23, issue.3, pp.199-226, 2010.

R. V. Joule, F. Bernard, and S. Halimi-falkowicz, Promoting ecocitizenship: In favor of binding communication, International Scientific Journal for Alternative Energy and Ecology, vol.6, pp.214-218, 2008.

R. V. Joule, F. Girandola, and F. Bernard, How Can People Be Induced to Willingly Change Their Behavior? The Path from Persuasive Communication to Binding Communication, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, vol.1, issue.1, pp.493-505, 2007.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1990.tb00411.x

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00585299

A. Kollmus and J. Agyeman, Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, pp.239-260, 2002.

K. V. Kortenkamp and C. F. Moore, Time, Uncertainty, and Individual Differences in Decisions to Cooperate in Resource Dilemmas, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol.96, issue.4907, pp.603-615, 2006.
DOI : 10.1177/0146167205284006

A. M. Lokhorst, C. Werner, H. Staats, E. Van-dijk, and J. L. Gale, Commitment and Behavior Change: A Meta-Analysis and Critical Review of Commitment-Making Strategies in Environmental Research, Environment and Behavior, vol.45, issue.1, pp.3-34, 2013.
DOI : 10.1177/0013916511411477

T. M. Milfont, Global warming, climate change and human psychology Psychological approaches to sustainability: Current trends in theory, research and practice, pp.19-42, 2010.

T. L. Milfont and V. V. Gouveia, Time perspective and values: An exploratory study of their relations to environmental attitudes, Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol.26, issue.1, pp.72-82, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.03.001

F. Ölander and J. Thøgersen, The A-B-C of recycling, European Advances in Consumer Research, pp.297-302, 2006.

S. Orbell and M. Hagger, Temporal framing and the decision to take part in type 2 diabetes screening: Effects of individual differences in consideration of future consequences on persuasion., Health Psychology, vol.25, issue.4, pp.537-548, 2006.
DOI : 10.1037/0278-6133.25.4.537

S. Orbell and M. Kyriakaki, Temporal framing and persuasion to adopt preventive health behavior: Moderating effects of individual differences in consideration of future consequences on sunscreen use., Health Psychology, vol.27, issue.6, pp.770-779, 2008.
DOI : 10.1037/0278-6133.27.6.770

S. Orbell, M. Perugini, and T. Rakow, Individual Differences in Sensitivity to Health Communications: Consideration of Future Consequences., Health Psychology, vol.23, issue.4, pp.388-396, 2004.
DOI : 10.1037/0278-6133.23.4.388

R. M. Perloff, The dynamics of persuasion, 2003.

J. V. Petrocelli, Factor Validation of the Consideration of Future Consequences Scale: Evidence for a Short Version, The Journal of Social Psychology, vol.143, issue.4, pp.405-413, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00113-X

A. Rabinovich, T. Morton, and T. Postmes, Time perspective and attitude-behaviour consistency in future-oriented behaviours, British Journal of Social Psychology, vol.77, issue.2, pp.69-89, 2010.
DOI : 10.1348/014466608X401875

P. W. Schultz and S. Oskamp, Effort as a Moderator of the Attitude-Behavior Relationship: General Environmental Concern and Recycling, Social Psychology Quarterly, vol.59, issue.4, pp.375-383, 1996.
DOI : 10.2307/2787078

H. Staats, A. P. Wit, and C. Y. Midden, Communicating the Greenhouse Effect to the Public: Evaluation of a Mass Media Campaign from a Social Dilemma Perspective, Journal of Environmental Management, vol.46, issue.2, pp.189-203, 1996.
DOI : 10.1006/jema.1996.0015

L. Steg and C. Vlek, Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda, Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol.29, issue.3, pp.309-317, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004

P. C. Stern, New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior, Journal of Social Issues, vol.56, issue.3, pp.407-424, 2000.
DOI : 10.1111/0022-4537.00175

P. C. Stern, T. Dietz, T. Abel, G. A. Guagnano, and L. Kalof, A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism, Human Ecology Review, vol.6, issue.2, pp.81-97, 1999.

A. Strathman, F. Gleicher, D. S. Boninger, and C. Scott-edwards, The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.66, issue.4, pp.742-752, 1994.
DOI : 10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.742

D. Uzzell and N. Räthzel, La contextualisation de la psychologie environnementale : une nécessaire évolution [The contextualization of environmental psychology: A necessary evolution, Psychologie et développement durable [Psychology and sustainable development], pp.247-277, 2010.

P. G. Zimbardo and J. N. Boyd, Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.77, issue.6, pp.1271-1288, 1999.
DOI : 10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271

. Note, The number of participants is given in brackets and the length of time is expressed in hours