T. Aoyama, Deixis and value: A semantic analysis of the Japanese demonstratives, pp.289-320, 1995.
DOI : 10.1515/9783110907575.289

K. Bühler, Sprachtheorie, 1934.

K. Bühler, The deictic field of language and deictic words, Extracts in English from Bühler, pp.12-28, 1934.

J. Cheshire, That jacksprat: An interactional perspective on English that, Journal of Pragmatics, vol.25, issue.3, pp.369-93, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/0378-2166(95)00032-1

F. Cornish, Anaphora, discourse, and understanding. Evidence from English and French, 1999.

K. Ehlich, Anaphora and deixis: same, similar, or different?, pp.315-338, 1982.

C. J. Fillmore, Lectures on deixis, 1997.

G. Genette, Figures III, 1972.

K. Glover, Proximal and distal deixis in negotiation talk, Journal of Pragmatics, vol.32, issue.7, pp.915-926, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00078-8

J. K. Gundel, N. Hedberg, and &. R. Zacharski, Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse, Language, vol.69, issue.2, pp.274-307, 1993.
DOI : 10.2307/416535

W. F. Hanks, The indexical ground of deictic reference Rethinking context: language as an interactive phenomenon, pp.43-76, 1992.

N. P. Himmelmann, Demonstratives in Narrative Discourse, pp.205-254, 1996.
DOI : 10.1075/tsl.33.08him

T. A. Janssen, Deixis from a cognitive point of view, pp.245-270, 1995.
DOI : 10.1515/9783110907575.245

R. Jarvella, Speech, place and action. Studies in deixis and related topics, 1982.

G. Kleiber, Anaphores et pronoms, 1994.

S. Kuroda, La S??mantique des D??monstratifs Japonais, Lingvisticae Investigationes International Journal of Linguistics and Language Resources, vol.9, issue.1, pp.69-81, 1985.
DOI : 10.1075/li.9.1.04kur

R. Lakoff, Remarks on this and that, Proceedings of the Tenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp.345-56, 1974.

J. W. Lapaire and . Rotgé, Linguistique et grammaire de l'anglais, 1991.

R. Laury, Demonstratives in interaction. The emergence of a definite article in Finnish, 1997.

R. A. Leonard, Deixis in Swahili: Attention meanings and pragmatic function, pp.271-287, 1995.
DOI : 10.1515/9783110907575.271

J. Lyons, Deixis and anaphora The development of conversation and discourse, pp.88-103, 1979.

J. Lyons, Deixis and subjectivity: Loquor, ergo sum? In, pp.101-124, 1982.

R. Maclaren, On two asymmetrical uses of the demonstrative determiners in English, Linguistics, vol.18, issue.9-10, pp.803-820, 1980.
DOI : 10.1515/ling.1980.18.9-10.803

A. Maes, Nominal anaphors, markedness, and the coherence of discourse, 1996.

G. Myers, This and that in discourse anaphora: the ambiguity of references to propositions. Paper presented at the Autumn meeting of the Linguistics Association of Great Britain, 1988.

J. Östman, Recasting the deictic foundation, using Physics and Finnish, Essays in semantics and pragmatics in honor of Charles J. Fillmore, 1995.

D. Schiffrin, Review article: The textual and contextual basis of discourse, Semiotica, vol.102, issue.12, pp.101-124, 1994.

S. Strauss, Why this and that are not complete without it Linguistic Society : i: The Main Session, Proceedings of the 29th Regional Meeting of the Chicago, pp.403-417, 1993.