A. Bell, Ch. 6: Stylin' the News: Audience design, The Language of News Media. Oxford: Blackwell, pp.104-125, 1991.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00631957

K. Bühler, Sprachtheorie, 1934.

K. Bühler, Theory of Language: The representational function of language, 1990.

J. Cheshire, That jacksprat: An interactional perspective on English that, Journal of Pragmatics, vol.25, issue.3, pp.369-93, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/0378-2166(95)00032-1

E. Clark, From gesture to word: On the natural history of deixis in language acquisition, Human Growth and Development, pp.85-120, 1978.

H. H. Clark and A. Bangerter, Ch. 2: Changing ideas about reference, Experimental Pragmatics, pp.25-49, 2004.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00222699

M. Consten, 10. Towards a unified model of domain-bound reference, Deictic Conceptualisation of Space, Time and Person, 2003.
DOI : 10.1075/pbns.112.12con

F. Cornish, Anaphora, Discourse and Understanding. Evidence from English and French, 1999.

F. Cornish, ???Modal??? that as determiner and pronoun: the primacy of the cognitive-interactive dimension, English Language and Linguistics, vol.5, issue.02, pp.297-315, 2001.
DOI : 10.1017/S1360674301000259

F. Cornish, English demonstratives: Discourse deixis and anaphora. A discourse-pragmatic account, pp.147-166, 2007.

F. Cornish, How indexicals function in texts: Discourse, text, and one neo-Gricean account of indexical reference, Journal of Pragmatics, vol.40, issue.6, pp.997-1018, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.02.006

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00967884

F. Cornish, Anaphora: Text-based or discourse-dependent?: Functionalist vs. formalist accounts, Functions of Language, vol.17, issue.2, 2010.
DOI : 10.1075/fol.17.2.03cor

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00976574

Ö. Dahl and C. Hellmann, What happens when we use an anaphor? In, Papers from the XVth Scandinavian Conference on Linguistics, pp.79-86, 1995.

D. Mulder and W. , Demonstrative noun phrases, Givenness, and Relevance Theory, pp.167-184, 2007.

H. Diessel, Demonstratives. Form, function, and grammaticalization, 1999.

H. Diessel, Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar, Cognitive Linguistics, vol.17, issue.4, pp.463-489, 2006.
DOI : 10.1515/COG.2006.015

K. Ehlich, Anaphora and deixis: Same, similar, or different?, pp.315-338, 1982.

C. J. Fillmore, Lectures on Deixis, Discourse Structure and Anaphora: Written and conversational English, 1987.

G. Francis, Anaphoric Nouns, 1986.

K. Glover, Proximal and distal deixis in negotiation talk, Journal of Pragmatics, vol.32, issue.7, pp.915-926, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00078-8

K. Green, New Essays in Deixis. Discourse, Narrative, Literature, 1995.

W. F. Hanks, The indexical ground of deictic reference Rethinking Context: Language as an interactive phenomenon, pp.43-76, 1992.

W. F. Hanks, Fieldwork on deixis, Journal of Pragmatics, vol.41, issue.1, pp.10-24, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.003

N. P. Himmelmann, Demonstratives in Narrative Discourse, Studies in Anaphora, pp.205-254, 1996.
DOI : 10.1075/tsl.33.08him

R. J. Jarvella and W. Klein, Speech, Place and Action. Studies in deixis and related topics, 1982.

P. Jones, Philosophical and theoretical issues in the study of deixis: A critique of the standard account, pp.27-48, 1995.

D. Kemmerer, ???Near??? and ???far??? in language and perception, Cognition, vol.73, issue.1, pp.35-63, 1999.
DOI : 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00040-2

G. Kleiber, Sur l'anaphore démonstrative, Le discours. Représentations et interprétations. Nancy : Presses Universitaires de Nancy, pp.243-263, 1990.

G. Kleiber, Anaphores et pronoms, 1994.

R. Lakoff, Remarks on this and that, Proceedings of the Tenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp.345-56, 1974.

J. Lapaire and W. Rotgé, Linguistique et grammaire de l'anglais, Toulouse : Presses Universitaires du Mirail, 1991.

R. Laury, Demonstratives in Interaction. The emergence of a definite article in Finnish, 1997.

S. C. Levinson, Deixis The Handbook of Pragmatics, pp.97-121, 2004.

J. J. Lyons, Deixis as the source of reference Formal Semantics of Natural Language Reprinted as Ch Natural Language and Universal Grammar, pp.61-83, 1975.

J. Lyons, Ch. 15: Deixis, space and time, Semantics, pp.636-724, 1977.

J. Lyons, Deixis and anaphora The Development of Conversation and Discourse Reprinted as Ch Natural Language and Universal Grammar, pp.88-103, 1979.

J. Lyons, Deixis and subjectivity: Loquor, ergo sum?, pp.101-124, 1982.

J. R. Martin, Ch. 3: Identification. Reference as semantic choice, English Text: System and structure, pp.93-157, 1992.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00631957

R. Mitkov, Anaphora Resolution, 2002.
DOI : 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199276349.013.0014

R. A. Nilson, N. Aba-appiah-amfo, and K. Borthen, Interpreting Utterances: Pragmatics and its Interfaces. Essays in honour of Thorstein Fretheim, 2007.

G. Nunberg, Indexicality and deixis, Linguistics and Philosophy, vol.40, issue.1, pp.1-43, 1993.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00984721

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=

J. Östman, Recasting the deictic foundation, using Physics and Finnish, Essays in Semantics and Pragmatics in honor of Charles J. Fillmore. Amsterdam, pp.247-278, 1995.

P. Piwek, R. Beun, and A. Cremers, ???Proximal??? and ???distal??? in language and cognition: Evidence from deictic demonstratives in Dutch, Journal of Pragmatics, vol.40, issue.4, pp.694-718, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.001

F. Récanati, Ch. 6: Deixis and anaphora, Semantics versus Pragmatics, pp.286-316, 2005.

E. Semino, Deixis and the dynamics of poetic voice, pp.145-160, 1995.

F. Toupin, Référence et deixis : le cas de this et that adverbes, La Référence ? 1 ? Statut et processus. Rennes : Presses Universitaires de Rennes, pp.65-84, 1998.

B. Webber, Structure and ostension in the interpretation of discourse deixis, Language and Cognitive Processes, vol.14, issue.2, pp.107-135, 1999.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00632602