D. Anaphora, anadeixis " : nature and description English demonstratives: discourse deixis and anaphora. A discourse-pragmatic account, Interpreting Utterances: Pragmatics and its Interfaces. Essays in honour of Thorstein Fretheim, pp.147-163, 2007.

. Anaphora, Text-based or discourse-dependent? Functionalist vs. formalist accounts. Functions of Language (John Benjamins) 17, pp.207-241, 2010.

M. Ariel, Accessing Noun Phrase Antecedents, 1990.

A. Berrendonner, Attracteurs, Cahiers de Linguistique Française, vol.11, pp.149-158, 1990.

G. Brown and G. Yule, Discourse Analysis, 1983.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511805226

K. Bühler, Sprachtheorie, 1934.

K. Bühler, Theory of Language: The representational function of language, 1990.

S. Chapman, Paul Grice, Philosopher and Linguist, 2005.

M. &. Charolles and . Sprenger-charolles, Les paradoxes de la résolution immédiate des pronoms, Actes du colloque de Fribourg, pp.159-189, 1989.

H. H. Clark, Using Language, 1996.

F. Cornish, Anaphora, Discourse and Understanding. Evidence from English and French, 1999.

D. Mulder and W. , Les démonstratifs : des indices de changement de contexte, Entre général et particulier : les déterminants. Arras: Artois Presses Université, pp.137-125, 1997.

H. Diessel, Demonstratives. Form, function and grammaticalization, 1999.

H. Diessel, Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar, Cognitive Linguistics, vol.17, issue.4, pp.463-489, 2006.
DOI : 10.1515/COG.2006.015

S. C. Dik, The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part I: The structure of the clause, 1997.

K. Ehlich, Anaphora and deixis: Same, similar, or different? Speech, Place and Action. Studies in deixis and related topics, pp.315-338, 1982.

K. Ehrlich and &. K. Rayner, Pronoun assignment and semantic integration during reading: eye movements and immediacy of processing, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, vol.22, issue.1, pp.75-87, 1983.
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-5371(83)80007-3

K. Fraurud, Cognitive ontology and NP form Reference and Referent Accessibility, pp.65-87, 1996.

M. Gerner, Deictic Features of Demonstratives: A Typological Survey with Special Reference to the Miao Group, The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique, vol.54, issue.1, pp.43-90, 2009.
DOI : 10.1353/cjl.0.0034

M. Groefsema, Understood arguments: A semantic/pragmatic approach, Lingua, vol.96, issue.2-3, pp.139-161, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0024-3841(95)00002-H

C. Guillot, Entre anaphore et deixis: l???anaphore d??monstrative ?? fonction r??somptive, Actes du XXIVè Congrès International de Linguistique et de Philologie Romanes, pp.307-315, 2004.
DOI : 10.1515/9783110923575.307

J. J. Gumperz, Contextualization and understanding. Ch Rethinking Context: Language as an interactive phenomenon, pp.229-252, 1992.

J. J. Gumperz, Contextualization revisited The Contextualization of Language, pp.39-53, 1992.

J. K. Gundel, N. Hedberg, and R. Zacharski, Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse, Language, vol.69, issue.2, pp.175-204, 1993.
DOI : 10.2307/416535

M. Halliday and R. Hasan, Cohesion in English, 1976.

J. Hankamer and I. A. Sag, Deep and surface anaphora, Linguistic Inquiry, vol.7, pp.391-426, 1976.

W. F. Hanks, The indexical ground of deictic reference Rethinking Context: Language as an interactive phenomenon, pp.43-76, 1992.

J. Hawkins, Definiteness and Indefiniteness. A Study in Reference and Grammaticality Prediction, 1978.

N. P. Himmelmann, Demonstratives in Narrative Discourse, Studies in Anaphora, pp.205-254, 1996.
DOI : 10.1075/tsl.33.08him

A. Kehler, Coherence, Reference, and the Theory of Grammar, 2002.

A. Kehler, L. Kertz, H. Rohde, and J. L. Elman, Coherence and Coreference Revisited, Journal of Semantics, vol.25, issue.1, pp.1-44, 2007.
DOI : 10.1093/jos/ffm018
URL : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3424618

G. Kleiber, Sur l'anaphore démonstrative, Le discours. Représentations et interprétations. Nancy : Presses Universitaires de Nancy, pp.243-263, 1990.

G. Kleiber, Anaphores et pronoms, 1994.

G. Kleiber, Des démonstratifs mémoriels aux démonstratifs de point de vue, Problèmes de sémantique et de syntaxe. Hommage à André Rousseau, 2007.

. Villeneuve-d-', Ascq : Editions du Conseil Scientifique de l, pp.373-392

A. Lehrer, Verbs and deletable objects, Lingua, vol.25, pp.227-253, 1970.
DOI : 10.1016/0024-3841(70)90036-7

S. C. Levinson, Deixis The Handbook of Pragmatics, pp.97-121, 2004.

J. Lyons, Deixis as the source of reference Formal Semantics of Natural Language, pp.61-83, 1975.

J. Lyons, Ch. 15: Deixis, space and time, Semantics, pp.636-724, 1977.

M. J. Mcshane, A Theory of Ellipsis, 2005.

S. Mejri and J. François, Restrictions sémantiques sur l'objet sous-entendu de verbes transitifs (le cas de boire), Composition sntaxique et figement lexical, 2006.

P. Piwek, R. Beun, and A. Cremers, ???Proximal??? and ???distal??? in language and cognition: Evidence from deictic demonstratives in Dutch, Journal of Pragmatics, vol.40, issue.4, pp.694-718, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.001

M. Recasens, E. Hovy, and M. A. Martí, Identity, non-identity, and near-identity: Addressing the complexity of coreference, Lingua, vol.121, issue.6, pp.1138-1152, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.lingua.2011.02.004

I. A. Sag and J. Hankamer, Toward a theory of anaphoric processing, Linguistics and Philosophy, vol.13, issue.3, pp.325-345, 1984.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00627709

C. Schnedecker, Les démonstratifs « prédicatifs » : qu'est-ce qui limite leur apport informatif ?, Langue Française, vol.152, pp.39-55, 2006.
DOI : 10.3406/lfr.2006.6634
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00808798/document

R. D. Van-valin and R. Lapolla, Syntax. Structure, meaning and function, 1997.