M. Ariel, Accessibility theory: an overview. Ch. 2 in, Text Representation: Cognitive and linguistic aspects, pp.29-87, 2001.

A. Berrendonner, Redoublement actanciel et nominalizations In Problèmes de sémantique et de relations entre micro-et macro-syntaxe. Actes des, pp.215-244, 1994.

S. E. Blackwell, Constraints on Spanish NP Anaphora: The Syntactic versus the Pragmatic Domain, Hispania, vol.81, issue.3, pp.606-618, 1998.
DOI : 10.2307/345683

S. E. Blackwell, Testing the neo-Gricean pragmatic theory of anaphora: The influence of consistency constraints on interpretations of coreference in Spanish, Journal of Pragmatics, vol.33, issue.6, pp.901-941, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0378-2166(01)80034-5

C. Brisson, The licensing of unexpressed objects in English verbs, Papers from the 30 th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp.90-102, 1994.

M. Butt and W. Geuder, The Projection of Arguments. Lexical and compositional factors, 1998.

F. Cornish, Anaphora, Discourse, and Understanding. Evidence from English and French, 1999.

F. Cornish, ???Downstream??? effects on the predicate in Functional Grammar clause derivations, Journal of Linguistics, vol.38, issue.02, pp.247-278, 2002.
DOI : 10.1017/S0022226702001433

F. Cornish, Degrees of Indirectness, Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, vol.263, pp.199-220, 2005.
DOI : 10.1075/cilt.263.12cor

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00967378

F. Cornish, A. Garnham, W. Cowles, M. Fossard, and V. André, Indirect anaphora in English and French: A cross-linguistic study of pronoun resolution, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.52, issue.3, pp.363-376, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jml.2004.12.004

S. C. Dik, The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 1: The structure of the clause, 1997.

C. J. Fillmore, Pragmatically Controlled Zero Anaphora, Proceedings of the 12 th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp.95-107, 1986.
DOI : 10.3765/bls.v12i0.1866

G. Velasco, D. Portero-muñoz, and C. , Understood objects in Functional Grammar. Working Papers in Functional Grammar, pp.1-22, 2002.

A. Goldberg, Patient arguments of causative verbs can be omitted, Language Sciences, vol.23, issue.4-5, pp.503-524, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0388-0001(00)00034-6

M. Groefsema, Understood arguments: A semantic/pragmatic approach, Lingua, vol.96, issue.2-3, pp.139-161, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0024-3841(95)00002-H

J. K. Gundel, N. Hedberg, and R. Zacharski, Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse, Language, vol.69, issue.2, pp.274-307, 1993.
DOI : 10.2307/416535

J. K. Gundel, N. Hedberg, and R. Zacharski, Statut cognitif et forme des anaphoriques indirects, Verbum XXII, vol.1, pp.79-102, 2000.

Y. Huang, Anaphora. A cross-linguistic study, 2000.

R. S. Jackendoff, Semantic Structures, 1990.

R. Jackendoff, Pr??cis of Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution,, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.26, issue.06, 2002.
DOI : 10.1017/S0140525X03000153

G. Kleiber, Anaphores et pronoms, 1994.

J. Koenig and G. Mauner, A-definites and the discourse status of implicit arguments, Journal of Semantics, vol.16, issue.3, pp.207-236, 2000.
DOI : 10.1093/jos/16.3.207

K. Lambrecht and K. Lemoine, Definite null objects in (spoken) French. A Construction-Grammar account, Proceedings of the First International Construction-Grammar Conference, 2006.

M. Larjavaara, Présence ou absence de l'objet. Limites du possible en français contemporain, 2000.

A. Lehrer, Verbs and deletable objects, Lingua, vol.25, pp.227-253, 1970.
DOI : 10.1016/0024-3841(70)90036-7

URL : http://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(70)90036-7

B. Levin and M. Hovav, Argument Realization, 2005.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511610479

S. C. Levinson, Presumptive Meanings. The theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature, 2000.

M. Usón, R. Faber, and P. , Functional Grammar and lexical templates, pp.39-94, 2002.

G. Mauner, A. Melinger, J. Koenig, and B. Bienvenue, When is schematic participant information encoded? Evidence from eye-monitoring, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.47, issue.3, pp.386-406, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00009-8

S. Mejri and J. François, Restrictions sémantiques sur l'objet sous-entendu de verbes transitifs (le cas de boire) To appear in Composition syntaxique et figement lexical, 2005.

A. Mittwoch, On the difference between eating and eating something: activities versus accomplishments, Linguistic Inquiry, vol.13, issue.1, pp.113-122, 1982.

M. Noailly, Transitivité absolue et type de prédication, Prédication, assertion, information. Actes du Colloque d'Uppsala en linguistique française, pp.6-9, 1996.

M. Noailly, Emploi absolu, anaphore zéro et transitivité, La Transitivité. Lille: Éditions du Septentrion, pp.131-144, 1998.

E. F. Prince, The ZPG Letter, pp.295-325
DOI : 10.1075/pbns.16.12pri

J. Pustejovsky, Lexicon, Generative, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01971-4

R. Hovav, M. Levin, and B. , Building verb meanings, Ch, vol.4, pp.97-134, 1998.

E. Ritter and S. Thomas-rosen, Delimiting events in syntax. Ch. 5 in, pp.135-164, 1998.

A. Van-hout, Event semantics in the lexicon-syntax interface: verb frame alternations in Dutch and their acquisition Events as Grammatical Objects. The Converging Perspectives of Lexical Semantics and Syntax, pp.230-282, 1999.

R. D. Van-valin and R. J. Lapolla, Syntax: Structure, meaning and function, 1997.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9781139166799

Z. Vendler, Linguistics in Philosophy, 1967.